|
Circulate
petition against cyanide in mining |
Background: |
|||
|
23% Say They
Are Less Likely
|
||||
23% Say They Are Less Likely to Vacation in Northern
|
| Number of Jobs | Expenditures | Revenues to State& Local Government | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three County Total (Forest, Langlade, Oneida) | 7,181 | $283,673,204 | $43,686,574 |
| 23% at risk from mine opening, according to poll | 23% of Jobs | 23% of Expenditures | 23% of Revenue to Government |
| 1,651 | $65,244, | $10,047,912 |
Forest, Langlade, Menominee, Shawano, Waupaca, and Winebago Counties
| Number of Jobs | Expenditures | Revenues to State& Local Government | Six County Total | 13,993 | $478,594,503 | $72,500,649 |
|---|---|---|---|
![]()
| Oppose a sulfide mine in Northern Wisconsin Support a ban on the use of cyanide in Wisconsin mines Require mine operators to meet the same groundwater and Deny state mining permits to documented polluters |
| For immediate release,
July 31, 2001 The statewide polling found support for the ban on cyanide in mining by a more than 3 to 1 margin, with 60% of those polled in favor. On the question of sulfide mining in northern Wisconsin, 55% statewide were opposed to locating a sulfide mine in northern Wisconsin. Two other issues were polled: strengthened "Bad Actor" legislation and "Equal Treatment" legislation requiring mining to meet the same environmental regulations as other state industry. State residents strongly support Bad Actor (70%) and Equal Treatment (90%). Chamberlain Research surveyed 600 Wisconsin residents age 21 and over during the first two weeks in June this year. The poll used standard polling techniques and can be projected to the population at large with a 95% degree of certainty. Environmentalists, Native American nations, sportfishing groups, and others have for years opposed the proposed Crandon zinc-copper mine next to the Mole Lake Chippewa Reservation, and possible gold mines elsewhere in northern Wisconsin. The Australian/South African mining conglomerate BHP Billiton now owns the mine project. According to DNR consultant Andres Trevino, the mine would use up to 200 tons a year of cyanide in ore processing. Wisconsin Republicans in the poll supported a prohibition on the use of cyanide in all Wisconsin mines by 2 to 1. Republican Party supporters also opposed new metallic sulfide mines in northern Wisconsin by a plurality of 42 percent to 35 percent. "The Republican Party has been recently criticized around the country for having anti-environmental policies. But we can see that Republican Party supporters here in Wisconsin have a stronger environmental concern," said Zoltan Grossman of the Midwest Treaty Network's Wolf Watershed Educational Project, "Cyanide in mining is the Wisconsin version of the national controversy over arsenic in drinking water." "The cyanide issue offers moderate Republicans a chance to show their true environmental colors, and offers an environmental litmus test to Republican leadership." said Dave Blouin, Mining Impact Coalition of Wisconsin, "Cyanide is presently not being used in this pristine area of northern Wisconsin. We are finding that many Republicans do not want toxic cyanide dumped in the headwaters of our northern rivers. They also do not want their leaders to be perceived as pro-cyanide leading up to next year's election." Republican Assembly Representatives Judy Krawczyk (R-Green Bay) and Terri McCormick (R-Appleton) attended Monday's Green Bay press conference releasing the poll, which was commissioned by the Forest County Potawatomi Community. George Rock, a Wolf River sportfisherman and Wolf Watershed Educational Project leader, pointed out that the poll showed a majority of northeastern Wisconsin residents opposed both new mines and the use of cyanide in these mines. He explained that, "This poll shows the success of our alliance that has brought together tribes and sportfishers, environmentalists with unionists, and students with rural residents. It also shows that people around the proposed mine site do not buy the mining company's promise of jobs, but see their existing tourism jobs as threatened by mining." Senator Russ Decker has introduced Senate Bill 160 (a companion to Assembly Bill 95) to ban the use of cyanide in all Wisconsin mines. The bill won approval in the Senate Environmental Resources Committee in May, and will be voted on by the full Senate in October. Blouin said that "Attempts will be made to single out and exempt the Crandon mine from the prohibition on cyanide, for the sole purpose of allowing the only currently proposed mine to go forward. But the poll confirms strong public support for Senator Decker's bill to ban cyanide in all Wisconsin mines, without exceptions. The public is not supportive of any new metallic mines, much less any that use such a chemical so threatening to northern game fish." Five counties have passed resolutions supporting a cyanide ban in mining (Rusk, Langlade, Shawano, Brown and Milwaukee), joined by three tribes and at least 16 local governments in the Wolf-Fox river watershed. More than 13,000 Wisconsin citizens have signed a cyanide ban petition, and environmental, sportfishing, tribal, union and student groups have signed on to the Wisconsin Campaign to Ban Cyanide in Mining. For more information, log on No Crandon Mine at http://www.nocrandonmine.com, A petition and local government resolution can be printed from the website, and sent to the Campaign at PO Box 14382, Madison WI 53714 (toll-free Hotline at 800-445-8615). The Campaign urged supporters to ask their lawmakers not only to vote for Senate Bill 160 and Assembly Bill 95 to ban cyanide in all Wisconsin mines, but also to vote against any exemptions to the ban that would allow the Crandon mine to open. (Call the toll-free Legislative Hotline at 800-362-9472, and write via the State Capitol, Madison WI 53702). |
Credit: Susan Simenski Bietila agitartgal@hotmail.com |
|
WISCONSIN CITIZENS OPPOSE
|
||
|
Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Releases Mining Study http://www.msnbc.com/local/WGBA/M74178.asp
De Pere, WI, July 30 - A new survey shows that Wisconsin residents are against laws that allow mining companies to pollute at higher levels than other industries. THE STUDY WAS commissioned by the Forest County Potawatomi tribe. A Madison research firm surveyed 600 state residents. The tribe's attorney general says the survey shows that Wisconsin residents don't want the mining industry to get special treatment. The survey says this includes areas where many people are employed by the mining industry. The survey shows that three in four residents support a ban on cyanide mining, like a proposed mine in Crandon. Four out of five residents want to keep mining companies with a history of damaging the environment out of Wisconsin. |
||
|
Poll: Most Residents Oppose Mine ProjectBy Peter Rebhahn Green Bay Press-Gazette July 31, 2001 http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/news/archive/local_837320.shtml Poll highlights: Here's how responses from residents of the Green Bay and Appleton areas compared with residents statewide in the mining poll. Oppose a sulfide mine in Northern Wisconsin Support a ban on the use of cyanide in Wisconsin mines Require mine operators to meet the same groundwater and hazardous
waste standards as other Wisconsin industries Deny state mining permits to documented polluters DE PERE --Results of a poll released Monday show that most Wisconsin residents oppose a copper and zinc mine proposed for the headwaters of the Wolf River near Crandon. More than 55 percent of 600 state residents polled said they oppose the sulfide mine proposed by Nicolet Minerals Co. Twenty-four percent said they supported the mine, and 21 percent said they weren't sure. Opposition to the mine was even stronger in Green Bay and the Fox Valley, where 61 percent of those polled said they opposed the mine. The poll by Madison-based Chamberlain Research Consultants was conducted in June, and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points. The Forest County Potawatomi Community commissioned the poll. Potawatomi tribal Chairman Gus Frank said at a news conference at Voyageur Park on Monday that the results confirm what tribe members long suspected. "The people are concerned about the impact of mechanical mining," he said. The poll also found that residents support by a 3-1 margin a bill pending in the Legislature that would ban the use of cyanide in mining in Wisconsin. Polled residents also favored by nearly a 4-1 margin new legislation to allow the state to refuse mining permits to companies with a history of pollution or environmental damage. Sulfide minerals exposed to air and rain form acids that can contaminate nearby lakes and rivers for generations. Cyanide spilled in mine processes unlike the one Nicolet Minerals proposes for Crandon have devastated rivers in Europe and the western United States. More than 90 percent of those polled also said they're in favor of new legislation that would plug loopholes in current law, which let mine operators follow less rigorous groundwater and hazardous waste standards than other industries. Sen. Dave Hansen, D-Green Bay, said he plans to introduce a bill that will hold mine operators to toughened standards. "It just makes sense, Hansen said. "Waste produced by mining stays forever." State Rep. Spencer Black, D-Madison, a staunch mine opponent and author of the cyanide ban bill, said he isn't surprised by the poll results. "This poll confirms with specific data what I've sensed in conversations with citizens across the state," Black said. |
||
|
Tougher Rules For Mining Have Bipartisan SupportA new poll shows a majority oppose a metallic sulfide mine near CrandonBy Warren Bluhm Green Bay News-Chronicle July 31, 2001 http://www.greenbaynewschron.com/page.html?article=109026 DE PERE - Representatives from both sides of the political aisle spoke strongly in support of holding metallic sulfide mines to the same environmental standards as any other industry, during a news conference at Voyageur Park on Monday organized by the Forest County Potawatomi Community. The tribe commissioned a poll that found more than 90 percent of Wisconsin residents favor requiring mines to meet the same groundwater and hazardous waste standards. The poll was directed at the proposed zinc and copper mine near Crandon, which has been moving slowly through the state permit process for years. State Rep. Judy Krawczyk, R-Green Bay, said Milwaukee-area and Illinois residents have told her they are willing to travel up to eight hours to Wisconsin's northwoods because "there's nothing like it where they live." She said any environmental damage done by the Crandon mine would have a domino effect, especially to the Wolf River. "Whatever we do, the Wolf River is going to trickle down to our waters here, which we've spent years cleaning up," Krawczyk said. "And now what's going to happen, we're going to get it cleaned up and they're going to say 'Oh my gosh, now we have a new pollutant in our waterway.'" State Sen. Dave Hansen (.pdf), D-Green Bay, said he plans to introduce legislation that would require metallic mining to meet the same state and federal environmental standards as any other business. "When the mine closes - and it will - and the mining company leaves - and they will - the waste doesn't go with. The waste stays," Hansen said. "Not for 10 or 20 years. Not even for 50 or 60 years. Waste produced by mining stays forever." State Rep. Terri McCormick, R-Appleton, said citizens need to be stewards of water and other natural resources for the sake of future generations. "We in the state of Wisconsin are vulnerable to international corporations that can come in and be treated differently," McCormick said. "It's time for that to stop." Jeff Crawford, attorney general of the Forest County Potawatomi, said the three lawmakers' presence at the news conference reflected the poll's findings, which crossed party lines: - Some 96 percent of Democrats, 94 percent of independents, and 82 percent of Republicans favor holding mines to the same standards as other industries. - Fifty-eight percent of state residents support a ban on the use of cyanide in metallic mining, and the number increases to 64.3 percent in the Green Bay and Appleton area. - More than two thirds - 70.5 percent - support passage of a "bad actor" provision that would deny mining permits to any company with more than three documented cases of pollution or environmental damages. - By a 2-1 margin - 55.2 to 23.8 percent - respondents said they oppose any metallic sulfide mine in northern Wisconsin. Democrats oppose the mine 67 to 17 percent, independents 61 to 22 percent, and Republicans 42 to 35 percent. Cristina Danforth, vice chairwoman of the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, said the Oneida strongly support the Forest County Potawatomis' efforts in opposition to the Crandon mine. "It's an important issue for the environment, for the people and for future generations," Danforth said. "We hold that responsibility very seriously." The poll was taken during the first two weeks in June by Chamberlain Research Consultants of Madison. Pollsters surveyed 600 Wisconsin residents age 21 and older and can be projected to the population at large with a 95 percent degree of certainty, Crawford said. |
||
|
||
News
Articles, Security of cyanide transportation
Background Articles on Cyanide in Mining:
in Wisconsin, United
States, Outside the U.S.
Poll shows majority opposes mining, cyanide in Wisconsin , July 2001
Past Press Releases
MTN Content Page
MTN Content Page